Difference between revisions of "Talk:Compile Code::Blocks plugins based on a nightly"

From CodeBlocks
Jump to: navigation, search
(explanation on how to show id+time)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
Yes and yes - however, for Alphas point I wanted to make sure users really understand they are linking against a DLL. Ollydbg: That is certainly true, so it should be mentioned.
 
Yes and yes - however, for Alphas point I wanted to make sure users really understand they are linking against a DLL. Ollydbg: That is certainly true, so it should be mentioned.
 +
 +
...btw: How do you get this nice tag like "Alpha 03:26, 23 August 2012 (CEST)"??? I guess I am using the talk board in a wrong way?
 +
 +
Hi, morten, this is a wiki build in function, you can add <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, this will be automatically replaced by the user ID+time. [[User:Ollydbg|Ollydbg]] 16:41, 23 August 2012 (CEST)

Latest revision as of 15:41, 23 August 2012

When linking directly to a dll (with MinGW), the file extension is not required, so wxmsw28u_gcc_cb.dll can be simply wxmsw28u_gcc_cb and codeblocks can remain the unchanged. Alpha 03:26, 23 August 2012 (CEST)

I think the mingw gcc version should match the version build nightlies, other wise, there may be some conflict with symbols or other things, currently our nightlies use tdm gcc 4.5.x. Ollydbg 03:52, 23 August 2012 (CEST)

Yes and yes - however, for Alphas point I wanted to make sure users really understand they are linking against a DLL. Ollydbg: That is certainly true, so it should be mentioned.

...btw: How do you get this nice tag like "Alpha 03:26, 23 August 2012 (CEST)"??? I guess I am using the talk board in a wrong way?

Hi, morten, this is a wiki build in function, you can add ~~~~, this will be automatically replaced by the user ID+time. Ollydbg 16:41, 23 August 2012 (CEST)