Difference between revisions of "Talk:Compile Code::Blocks plugins based on a nightly"

From CodeBlocks
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
Yes and yes - however, for Alphas point I wanted to make sure users really understand they are linking against a DLL. Ollydbg: That is certainly true, so it should be mentioned.
 
Yes and yes - however, for Alphas point I wanted to make sure users really understand they are linking against a DLL. Ollydbg: That is certainly true, so it should be mentioned.
 +
 +
...btw: How do you get this nice tag like "Alpha 03:26, 23 August 2012 (CEST)"??? I guess I am using the talk board in a wrong way?

Revision as of 07:23, 23 August 2012

When linking directly to a dll (with MinGW), the file extension is not required, so wxmsw28u_gcc_cb.dll can be simply wxmsw28u_gcc_cb and codeblocks can remain the unchanged. Alpha 03:26, 23 August 2012 (CEST)

I think the mingw gcc version should match the version build nightlies, other wise, there may be some conflict with symbols or other things, currently our nightlies use tdm gcc 4.5.x. Ollydbg 03:52, 23 August 2012 (CEST)

Yes and yes - however, for Alphas point I wanted to make sure users really understand they are linking against a DLL. Ollydbg: That is certainly true, so it should be mentioned.

...btw: How do you get this nice tag like "Alpha 03:26, 23 August 2012 (CEST)"??? I guess I am using the talk board in a wrong way?