Difference between revisions of "Talk:UnitTesting"
From Code::Blocks
(UnitTest site moved to Google code) |
(question about pedantic.) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The UnitTest site is moved to Google code [http://code.google.com/p/unittestpp/ unittestpp - UnitTest++ is a unit testing framework for C++ - Google Project Hosting], see: [http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=24525726 http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=24525726] [[User:Ollydbg|Ollydbg]] 10:51, 22 August 2012 (CEST) | The UnitTest site is moved to Google code [http://code.google.com/p/unittestpp/ unittestpp - UnitTest++ is a unit testing framework for C++ - Google Project Hosting], see: [http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=24525726 http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=24525726] [[User:Ollydbg|Ollydbg]] 10:51, 22 August 2012 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Why do you enable "-pedantic", this will introduce a gcc warning about usage of "long long" (I'm using winXP, GCC 4.6.x), to avoid such warning, I just disable the "pedantic" option. [[User:Ollydbg|Ollydbg]] 16:04, 7 September 2012 (CEST) |
Revision as of 14:04, 7 September 2012
The UnitTest site is moved to Google code unittestpp - UnitTest++ is a unit testing framework for C++ - Google Project Hosting, see: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=24525726 Ollydbg 10:51, 22 August 2012 (CEST)
Why do you enable "-pedantic", this will introduce a gcc warning about usage of "long long" (I'm using winXP, GCC 4.6.x), to avoid such warning, I just disable the "pedantic" option. Ollydbg 16:04, 7 September 2012 (CEST)